How to date a fossil using radiometric dating dating soderjanka
Hugh Ross and his fellow progressive creationists, along with the other pre-Adamite proponents, are trying to rescue the Bible from a perceived conflict with ‘science’ by reinterpreting the Bible rather than by questioning the ‘science’.
This is because they erroneously think that ‘science’ speaks with more authority than God’s Word about origins and the age of the Earth.
However, his adjusted range of dates does not solve the problem.
If it is possible that Adam and Eve lived 10,000 years ago, then this implies it is possible that such indigenous people are not descendants of Adam and Eve (which would mean that they could not be saved through Christ, our kinsman/redeemer—Isaiah ).
And leading ‘progressive creationist’ Hugh Ross teaches something similar when he says that “bipedal, tool-using, large-brained primates roamed Earth for hundreds of thousands (perhaps a million) years”.
Ross does not believe in biological evolution, although he accepts cosmic and geologic evolution and the evolutionary timescale.
These creatures stood on two feet, had large brains, and used tools. In time, all these man-like creatures went extinct.
Some Christians say that Adam was the first man to be made in the image of God, though there were also human-like creatures before him.
But they have assumed that the alleged Pre-Adamic fossils constitute a reliable record; i.e.
But human fossils are found ‘dated’ earlier than Adam’s genealogies could possibly allow.
This requires Ross to postulate the existence of creatures with human-like characteristics, but ‘spiritless’ (see Skull Wars). According to Ross, because the world was a place of death, violence and decay for hundreds of thousands/millions of years before the Curse recorded in Genesis –19.
They accepted a relatively young age for the Biblical Adam (if they retained belief in him at all), but said that the ‘old’ human fossils came from pre-Adamite human-like creatures. He writes: “[M]y acceptance of Adam and Eve as historical is not incompatible with my belief that several forms of pre-Adamic ‘hominid’ seem to have existed for thousands of years previously. It is conceivable that God created Adam out of one of them. I think you may even call some of them The late Anglican cleric John R. Stott (1921-2011) unfortunately believed that God could have created Adam out of some supposed pre-Adamic ‘hominid’.